Massive Fraud In 2014 South Africa Election

Hello All!

A follow up on my A Creative Campaign Of Fraudulence and Mockery about the 'de-mock-ratic' elections in South Africa last week.
This was written by ex director of the South African Reserve Bank (Central bank, Rothschild-owned). I, personally, had advance information that only a miniscule amount of votes would officially be counted for the Ubuntu Party, as just one example. I also heard of many people that would be voting for them - both before and after election day. So there's no way they received the pitiful official number they did.

I call for nothing less than a mass protest march on the ruling party and KZ puppet Zuma. We need to overthrow them NOW! As Zuma brazenly said post-election: 'The will of the people has spoken'. No Zuma. What you meant was your MANIPULATION has spoken. For the true will of the people to speak, we need an en masse public demonstration right now.
I'll happily stand on the frontline.

May the Truth prevail
Shellee-Kim

**********************

By Stephen Goodson

The South African election held on May 7, 2014 surpassed all previous levels of manipulation, bribery, corruption and fraud. Since the first multi-racial election took place on April 27, 1994 every election result has been rigged in the favour of the African National Congress (ANC). In an article in the Dutch newspaper Nederlands Dagblad under the title “Verkiezingen Zuid-Afrika oneerlijk: (Elections in South Africa dishonest), former president F.W. de Klerk admitted that he was aware that over one million ballots for the ANC “netjes in stapels” (neatly in piles) were placed in ballot boxes. He, however, decided not to object as wished “de natie vooruit te helpen” (to help the nation forward).http://www.rense.com/general/45/deklerk.htm

At that time a perceptive commentator made the observation that as the ANC, a compliant puppet of the international bankers, slowly ran the country into the ground and suffered a consequent drop in support, the party would have to resort to increasing levels of vote rigging in order to stay in power. In this election the ANC’s share of the vote declined by 3.7% from 65.9% in 2009 to 62.2%. In terms of the number of votes allegedly received, the decline was a trifling 213,827 from 11,650,748 to 11,436,921. This marginal decline occurred notwithstanding the fact that 50 % of the population lives below the poverty datum line, there is 40% black unemployment, there are over 16 million persons receiving a poverty reducing social grant, (pop. 52 million) and according to the Gini coefficient South Africa has the most unequal distribution of income in the world at 0.7! In any other normal society the ANC would have been heavily punished for its appalling record of service delivery, high levels of corruption (R30 billion or $3 billion was unaccounted for in the previous financial year), uncontrollable crime and poor economic growth, and thus suffered a comprehensive defeat.

According to an article in the Mail & Guardian vote rigging was rampant, particularly in the province of Gauteng where Johannesburg is situated. When it became clear that the ANC was slipping below the 50% barrier, counting was delayed for over 24 hours in order to manipulate the results in its favour. Independent observers have revealed that many counting slips were not signed off by the counting officer, or where they had been, they were not signed by a party agent. There were results which had been signed off by auditors, but differed enormously from the scanned slips. There were also huge differences in the votes cast by opposition parties on the national and provincial lists, which is a clear indication that there had been tampering with the ballot papers.

The head of the Independent Election Commission, whose ironic slogan is “ensuring free and fair elections”, is under investigation for alleged fraud by the National Treasury. It is not beyond the realms of possibility that Mrs Tlakula was pressurised by government, and in the case of the UBUNTU Party by the Reserve Bank, into ensuring that the correct result was obtained in return for a suspended sentence and a substantial golden handshake. In this regard it also needs to be mentioned that Jacob Zuma, prior to becoming president of South Africa faced over 700 criminal charges for corruption and racketeering.

One of the major victims of this disgraceful vote rigging was the UBUNTU Party, which offered to the people of South Africa for the first time in its history a proposal to establish a People’s Bank, which would create the nation’s money supply free of debt and interest. The benefits flowing from a People’s Bank would enable all government infrastructure expenditure to be financed free of interest, home loans at 0% plus a small handling fee, agricultural loans at 0% plus a small handling fee, as in North Dakota, free electricity for domestic consumers as a result of the electricity utility no longer having to pay interest on its loans, lower taxes, zero inflation and near full employment. The UBUNTU Party launched a sophisticated publicity campaign using leaflets, posters, radio ads in multiple languages, radio interviews, a mobi-fun cell phone campaign, e-mails, t-shirts, you tube clips and a trailer parked all around Johannesburg. In addition to its existing membership of20,000, the party received thousands of offers of support and help and built up a supporter base of almost one million. Despite having a highly successful campaign, the party received a derisory 8,234 votes.

A spokesman for the UBUNTU Party said that they became aware that something was seriously wrong, when one of the party agents, who observed the counting of the international votes – the UBUNTU Party has a strong following overseas – reported that the party had received a quarter of the 18,132 votes cast i.e. 4,500, but only 16 votes were recorded on the scanned receipt.

The UBUNTU Party’s lawyers are currently studying the feasibility of taking this matter to the Constitutional Court with the ultimate purpose of having all the criminals involved in this voting scam exposed. They will also be canvassing for an increase in the two day time limit to lodge objections to five days, Perspex ballot boxes and for the use of Open Source Free Software in all future elections in order to prevent the endemic problem of vote rigging.